<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Our Payroll Guys - PEO, ASO &#38; Payroll&#187; Legal Compliance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thepayrollguys.com/category/legal-compliance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thepayrollguys.com</link>
	<description>Covering what you don&#039;t like to do, don&#039;t know how to do &#38; often times, don&#039;t even know you are supposed to do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 21:11:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The End of Unemployment Insurance?</title>
		<link>http://thepayrollguys.com/2011/06/the-end-of-unemployment-insurance/</link>
		<comments>http://thepayrollguys.com/2011/06/the-end-of-unemployment-insurance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hiring Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepayrollguys.com/?p=384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Through the Social Security Act of 1935, the US federal government effectively encouraged individual states to adopt unemployment insurance plans. It was never intended to be a long-term fix, but when the economy faces the strains of recent years, a new problem surfaces: the government is running out of money. With an average benefit of [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org' onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/yarpp.org?referer=');">Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" title="unemployment office" src="http://www.etftrends.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/081208unemployment.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="241" />Through the Social Security Act of 1935, the US federal government effectively encouraged individual states to adopt unemployment insurance plans. It was never intended to be a long-term fix, but when the economy faces the strains of recent years, a new problem surfaces: the government is running out of money.</p>
<p>With an average benefit of $270 per week, no one is getting rich off unemployment insurance, but even that amount has decreased. According to the laws of most states, once a person becomes unemployed, benefits last for at least 26 weeks. That time can be extended if one is still unable to find work, with a maximum extension of up to 99 weeks. During the economic recession, however, this duration was severely cut in many states. In 2010, roughly 1.4 million people had already used up their benefit period, and about 4 million are expected to end theirs by 2011.</p>
<p>In an average year, the states ask for about $80 million in federal grants to subsidize funding for the unemployed. Though the government hasn’t indulged the amount still available, it has declared that the benefit tenure will end in December 2011. At that point, those who have not exhausted their basic unemployment benefits will not be able to extend them.</p>
<p>Unfortunately this is not a new issue. Long-term unemployment situations have troubled the government fund for years. It is obviously not possible for the government to provide for the unemployed for an indefinite period of time, so the issue needs to be tackled in a different way. If the government is successful in creating new jobs, then more people will be able to support themselves and lessen the government burden. Another option is for the government to set up employment exchanges, where people will be judged on the basis of eligibility and ability to do work, and they will be assigned jobs accordingly.</p>
<p>What do you think? Has this information affected how you’re approaching employment issues in your office?</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org' onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/yarpp.org?referer=');">Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thepayrollguys.com/2011/06/the-end-of-unemployment-insurance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sometimes, the Government DOES Look Out for Us!</title>
		<link>http://thepayrollguys.com/2011/05/sometimes-the-government-does-look-out-for-us/</link>
		<comments>http://thepayrollguys.com/2011/05/sometimes-the-government-does-look-out-for-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 22:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepayrollguys.com/?p=377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On April 5 of this year, the Senate voted to repeal the healthcare overhaul’s 1099 tax reporting requirements, following the repeal of the provision by the House of Representatives. President Obama then signed the Comprehensive 1099 Taxpayer Protection and Repayment of Exchange Subsidy Overpayments Act of 2011 into law on April 14. What does this [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org' onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/yarpp.org?referer=');">Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" title="1099" src="http://solari.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/1099_300x120.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="120" />On April 5 of this year, the Senate voted to repeal the healthcare overhaul’s 1099 tax reporting requirements, following the repeal of the provision by the House of Representatives. President Obama then signed the Comprehensive 1099 Taxpayer Protection and Repayment of Exchange Subsidy Overpayments Act of 2011 into law on April 14.</p>
<p>What does this mean for you?</p>
<p>The original 1099 reporting requirement in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act would have made nearly every business-to-business transaction reportable to the Internal Revenue Service. The goal of the reporting was to raise nearly $19 billion to help pay for healthcare reform, and it stated that all business owners would need to report any transactions of $600 or more (or aggregate balances across a calendar year) with individuals or corporations. Previously, only payments to individuals were reportable.</p>
<p>Because this component of the healthcare law was repealed, that means business can continue as usual—at least for the foreseeable future. It also means less paperwork and less hassle for your small business. See, democracy does pay off!</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org' onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/yarpp.org?referer=');">Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thepayrollguys.com/2011/05/sometimes-the-government-does-look-out-for-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IRS Will Conduct Audits on 6,000 Companies Starting February 2010</title>
		<link>http://thepayrollguys.com/2009/12/irs-will-conduct-audits-on-6000-companies-starting-february-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://thepayrollguys.com/2009/12/irs-will-conduct-audits-on-6000-companies-starting-february-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MBarry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payroll service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payroll service expert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payroll services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepayrollguys.com/?p=225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The tax man may cometh in February 2010 for 6,000 businesses selected to participate in a special audit by the IRS. This study, conducted by the IRS National Research Program (NRP) will study employment taxes. The purpose of the study is to gather data to calculate possible ‘employment tax gap’ issues and target areas that may [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org' onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/yarpp.org?referer=');">Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tax man may cometh in February 2010 for 6,000 businesses selected to</p>
<div id="attachment_226" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-226" src="http://thepayrollguys.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/photo_stressedbusinessman-300x226.jpg" alt="Don't let upcoming IRS audits worry you. (Image courtesy of FreeDigitalPhotos.net)" width="300" height="226" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Don&#39;t let upcoming IRS audits worry you. (Image courtesy of FreeDigitalPhotos.net)</p></div>
<p>participate in a special audit by the IRS. This study, conducted by the IRS National Research Program (NRP) will study employment taxes. The purpose of the study is to gather data to calculate possible ‘employment tax gap’ issues and target areas that may be future problems.</p>
<p><strong>Audit specifics</strong><br />
The audits will likely involve a thorough review of the Employer’s Quarterly Tax Returns for the targeted year(s). Other related documents may also be reviewed, possibly forms 1120, 1065 and more.</p>
<p>This will be the largest audit since 1984, and will take place over the next three years. The IRS will examine 2,000 businesses in each of those years. The businesses will be selected at random and will represent a large cross-section of U.S. companies.</p>
<p>There are five main areas that the IRS will focus on: worker classification, reimbursed expenses, officer compensation, fringe benefits and non-filers. It’s a good bet that the auditors may look at other details as they review the five targeted elements.</p>
<p>There is nothing that a company can do to prevent being chosen for the audit, but there are steps that they can take to help make possible audits, future filings and compliance easier.</p>
<p><strong>Review payroll services</strong><br />
Small business owners should review the current payroll practices, focusing on the five areas that the NRP have identified as their specific focus. Review the three most recent years’ employment tax returns, the filing documents and supportive records. A third party payroll service expert can help with this process.</p>
<p>If your company is selected, follow these steps:</p>
<p>• Designate a company representative who is responsible for IRS communications<br />
• Early in the process, retain a payroll service and tax expert<br />
• Request time to respond to IRS requests</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org' onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/yarpp.org?referer=');">Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thepayrollguys.com/2009/12/irs-will-conduct-audits-on-6000-companies-starting-february-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Contractors Must Use E-Verify Starting September 8, 2009</title>
		<link>http://thepayrollguys.com/2009/08/federal-contractors-must-use-e-verify-starting-september-8-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://thepayrollguys.com/2009/08/federal-contractors-must-use-e-verify-starting-september-8-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 17:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hiring Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resource Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Verify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Contracotrs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payroll services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phoenix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepayrollguys.com/?p=165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Notice: Arizona businesses who do work for the US Government A business coalition, including the U.S. Chamber and SHRM, has lost in its effort to have a court overturn the federal regulation requiring federal contractors to start using the E-Verify Program for federal contracts that are entered into or modified after September 8, 2009.  The [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org' onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/yarpp.org?referer=');">Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<h3>Notice: Arizona businesses who do work for the US Government</h3>
</div>
<div><span style="color: #000000;">A business coalition, including the U.S. Chamber and SHRM, has lost in its effort to have a court overturn the federal regulation requiring federal contractors to start using the E-Verify Program for federal contracts that are <img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-166" title="US Citizenship &amp; Immigration" src="http://thepayrollguys.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Citizenship-Imm-logo-150x83.jpg" alt="Citizenship &amp; Imm logo" width="150" height="83" />entered into or modified after September 8, 2009.  The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Maryland on August 26, 2009, turned down all arguments raised by the plaintiffs and has opened the door for the rule to be applicable as planned on September 8, 2009. There is no word on whether or not the decision will be appealed.  The USCIS Web site has a <a title="E-Verify Information for Federal Contractors " href="http://rs6.net/tn.jsp?et=1102683849273&amp;s=859&amp;e=001oSruBia_84rAv7eq-yf9dLmx5kVN8j10swA-IXSVqqdboII4omjl-iUZuD7bez3TB4imetHsA_6CFXnqUNxwyafX4WLKdgUpPkjHq0FIvv0qLvtoMw9gGBgzZhijGbrW3izCOcTMhaX_UkLcWRDVz0KoufeTiQY8xdX_SqWS9ejjT0L3VUKuK-QCiPpHqPlCcxRmigkXZM4eWdIC9LlxMHPc0uYcWHj2cU_VLMd0P8z8I1MlQQpOAuXcvoxXRotd98A6J6HeuvXNRA4AZQookoCg9zSQ1t5oXG1Sb0xcqL47WFK5l2ohFIREoBpVxrPm52eCoIH_z6Cx8tBXy_QUlbc2CPdEKc2q" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/rs6.net/tn.jsp?et=1102683849273_amp_s=859_amp_e=001oSruBia_84rAv7eq-yf9dLmx5kVN8j10swA-IXSVqqdboII4omjl-iUZuD7bez3TB4imetHsA_6CFXnqUNxwyafX4WLKdgUpPkjHq0FIvv0qLvtoMw9gGBgzZhijGbrW3izCOcTMhaX_UkLcWRDVz0KoufeTiQY8xdX_SqWS9ejjT0L3VUKuK-QCiPpHqPlCcxRmigkXZM4eWdIC9LlxMHPc0uYcWHj2cU_VLMd0P8z8I1MlQQpOAuXcvoxXRotd98A6J6HeuvXNRA4AZQookoCg9zSQ1t5oXG1Sb0xcqL47WFK5l2ohFIREoBpVxrPm52eCoIH_z6Cx8tBXy_QUlbc2CPdEKc2q&amp;referer=');"><span style="color: #0000ff;">federal contractor page</span></a> as well as a <a title="Federal Contractors Must Use E-Verify - Q&amp;As" href="http://rs6.net/tn.jsp?et=1102683849273&amp;s=859&amp;e=001oSruBia_84pzIkLPGzAy7_QnjPpzXydflxMLveTyuIayvhIr2BjVLc1oLA8J2ppRcR_NU8A_obDO2Pt2Ae-IEU-qFlv0HuU6Hs_6LsJSKaDeOzG7G3NreX5MRPkPkk7IwcF7bWEByCQm5OfUoh5HX0Vn-JGE5EpZa9j7ZZibIa8wJwSBCltSLc2XUB72fEHELwv2YapNl2Ln285Hm1gSRAs-Bs-qcABpTXCnUxj3K7AaUQxON8HTMtgJgeYedz7avHDSIBieCemR75itT78AH1dtlM0AyPofXxzXnGx_pCIayuxAloYC5MTLB0QwlwdHadZhIZDujHW8L6Dwqx6cyLyXNG3b0Ne2" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/rs6.net/tn.jsp?et=1102683849273_amp_s=859_amp_e=001oSruBia_84pzIkLPGzAy7_QnjPpzXydflxMLveTyuIayvhIr2BjVLc1oLA8J2ppRcR_NU8A_obDO2Pt2Ae-IEU-qFlv0HuU6Hs_6LsJSKaDeOzG7G3NreX5MRPkPkk7IwcF7bWEByCQm5OfUoh5HX0Vn-JGE5EpZa9j7ZZibIa8wJwSBCltSLc2XUB72fEHELwv2YapNl2Ln285Hm1gSRAs-Bs-qcABpTXCnUxj3K7AaUQxON8HTMtgJgeYedz7avHDSIBieCemR75itT78AH1dtlM0AyPofXxzXnGx_pCIayuxAloYC5MTLB0QwlwdHadZhIZDujHW8L6Dwqx6cyLyXNG3b0Ne2&amp;referer=');"><span style="color: #0000ff;">series of Q&amp;As</span></a> on the rule that explains its provisions and application.</span></div>
<div><span style="color: #000000;"><br />
</span></div>
<div>Click for assistance with <a title="E-Verify &amp; Federal Contractor E-Verify Support" href="http://www.hcscando.com/HR.htm#NEWHIRE" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.hcscando.com/HR.htm_NEWHIRE?referer=');">E-Verify Requirements in Phoenix, Arizona</a>.</div>
<div>.</div>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org' onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/yarpp.org?referer=');">Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thepayrollguys.com/2009/08/federal-contractors-must-use-e-verify-starting-september-8-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Failure to Pay Taxes</title>
		<link>http://thepayrollguys.com/2009/08/failure-to-pay-taxes/</link>
		<comments>http://thepayrollguys.com/2009/08/failure-to-pay-taxes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[professional employer organization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepayrollguys.com/?p=139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you do business in Utah, you need a heads-up on this small article recently published in this daily Salt Lake City newspaper. It isn&#8217;t unheard of for this type of situation to arise. Be sure to know who you are working with or even see if they are willing to prove that they are [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org' onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/yarpp.org?referer=');">Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-medium wp-image-141 alignleft" title="irs logo" src="http://thepayrollguys.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/irs-logo-300x244.jpg" alt="IRS" width="151" height="123" /></p>
<p>If you do business in Utah, you need a heads-up on this small article recently published in this daily Salt Lake City newspaper. It isn&#8217;t unheard of for this type of situation to arise.  Be sure to know who you are working with or even see if they are willing to prove that they are making current tax deposits from time to time.  <a title="Failure to Pay Taxes" href="http://www.deseretnews.com/article/1,5143,705318884,00.html" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.deseretnews.com/article/1_5143_705318884_00.html?referer=');">Click here</a> to read more about this article.</p>
<p>To find a Professional Employer Organization (PEO) provider in good standing with both the IRS and NAPEO, check out <a title="Human Capital Strategies" href="http://www.hcscando.com/" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.hcscando.com/?referer=');">PEO Services</a>.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org' onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/yarpp.org?referer=');">Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thepayrollguys.com/2009/08/failure-to-pay-taxes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employment Audits Increase</title>
		<link>http://thepayrollguys.com/2009/08/employment-audits-increase/</link>
		<comments>http://thepayrollguys.com/2009/08/employment-audits-increase/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 20:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payroll services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phoenix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepayrollguys.com/?p=140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Attention: Payroll Notice for Phoenix, Arizona Businesses The IRS plans to increase federal employment tax audits this fall and is focusing on four issues: worker classification (the employee versus independent contractor issue); fringe benefits (taxable versus tax-free); officer&#8217;s compensation; and reimbursed expenses. The IRS audit program will select employers for audit based on a statistical [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org' onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/yarpp.org?referer=');">Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Attention: Payroll Notice for Phoenix, Arizona Businesses</h3>
<p>The IRS plans to increase federal employment tax audits this fall and is focusing on four issues: worker classification<img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-151" title="Tax Audit" src="http://thepayrollguys.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Tax-Audit-250x300.jpg" alt="Tax Audit" width="250" height="300" /> (the employee versus independent contractor issue); fringe benefits (taxable versus tax-free); officer&#8217;s compensation; and reimbursed expenses. The IRS audit program will select employers for audit based on a statistical sample. While the audit program is not focused on fraud, the IRS has also increased the number of investigators looking into employment tax fraud by 249 percent and, according to the IRS, the average sentence imposed on those convicted of tax fraud runs 29 months.     Maryland, the governor has created a task force by Executive Order to enforce the Workplace Fraud Act of 2009 aimed at improper classification of employees as independent contractors. Though the act was aimed at the construction and landscaping industries, the task force is not as limited in its focus and can look further af</p>
<p>Click for assistance with <a title="payroll &amp; payroll tax support" href="http://www.hcscando.com/Payroll.htm" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.hcscando.com/Payroll.htm?referer=');">phoenix payroll &amp; arizona payroll tax</a> matters.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org' onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/yarpp.org?referer=');">Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thepayrollguys.com/2009/08/employment-audits-increase/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>July Sees a Jump in the Minimum Wage</title>
		<link>http://thepayrollguys.com/2009/07/july-sees-a-jump-in-the-minimum-wage/</link>
		<comments>http://thepayrollguys.com/2009/07/july-sees-a-jump-in-the-minimum-wage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minimum wage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepayrollguys.com/?p=110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) was amended in 2007 to increase the Federal minimum wage in three steps.  July 24, 2009 marks the last incremental raise in pay.  The current federal minimum which is $6.55 per hour will change to $7.25 per hour.  Prior to 2007 when the federal minimum wage was increased from [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org' onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/yarpp.org?referer=');">Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) was amended in 2007 to increase the Federal minimum wage in three steps.  July 24, 2009 marks the last incremental raise in pay. </p>
<div id="attachment_127" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 113px"><img class="size-full wp-image-127" title="IRS Image" src="http://thepayrollguys.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/IRS-Image.jpg" alt="IRS" width="103" height="120" /><p class="wp-caption-text">IRS</p></div>
<p>The current federal minimum which is $6.55 per hour will change to $7.25 per hour.  Prior to 2007 when the federal minimum wage was increased from $5.15 per hour to $5.85 per hour, it had remained the same for ten years.   Wage and Hour Division, <em>www.dol.gov/esa/whd</em> (July 2009).</p>
<p><em>Commentary</em></p>
<p>As this is the last scheduled increase in the minimum wage from the 2007 amendment and with the recent job numbers, it is doubtful employers will see another wage increase anytime soon.</p>
<p>All employers should take note of the increase and adjust their wage schedule accordingly.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org' onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/yarpp.org?referer=');">Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thepayrollguys.com/2009/07/july-sees-a-jump-in-the-minimum-wage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I-9 Audit Notices to 652 Companies</title>
		<link>http://thepayrollguys.com/2009/07/i-9-audit-notices-to-652-companies/</link>
		<comments>http://thepayrollguys.com/2009/07/i-9-audit-notices-to-652-companies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hiring Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resource Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human resources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepayrollguys.com/?p=112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WASHINGTON – U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is launching a bold, new audit initiative today by issuing Notices of Inspection (NOIs) to 652 businesses nationwide &#8211; which exceeds the total number ICE issued throughout all of last fiscal year. The notices alert business owners that ICE will be inspecting their hiring records to determine [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org' onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/yarpp.org?referer=');">Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON –</p>
<p>U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is launching a bold, new audit initiative today by issuing Notices of Inspection (NOIs) to 652 businesses nationwide &#8211; which exceeds the total number ICE issued throughout all of last fiscal year. The notices alert business owners that ICE will be inspecting their hiring records to determine whether or not they are complying with employment eligibility verification laws and regulations. Inspections are one of the most powerful tools the federal government has to enforce employment and immigration laws. This new initiative illustrates ICE&#8217;s increased focus on holding employers accountable for their hiring practices and efforts to ensure a legal workforce.</p>
<p>&#8220;ICE is committed to establishing a meaningful I-9 inspection program to promote compliance with the law. This nationwide effort is a first step in ICE&#8217;s long-term strategy to address and deter illegal employment,&#8221; said Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary for ICE John Morton.</p>
<div id="attachment_116" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 88px"><img class="size-full wp-image-116   " title="DHS ICE" src="http://thepayrollguys.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/images7.jpg" alt="Department of Homeland Security" width="78" height="97" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Department of Homeland Security</p></div>
<p>Employers are required to complete and retain a Form I-9 for each individual they hire for employment in the United States. This form requires employers to review and record the individual&#8217;s identity document(s) and determine whether the document(s) reasonably appear to be genuine and related to the individual.</p>
<p>In FY 2008, ICE issued 503 similar notices throughout the year. In April, ICE implemented a new, comprehensive strategy to reduce the demand for illegal employment and protect employment opportunities for the nation&#8217;s lawful workforce. Under this strategy, ICE is focusing its resources on the auditing and investigation of employers suspected of cultivating illegal workplaces by knowingly employing illegal workers. The nationwide initiative being launched today is a direct result of this new strategy.</p>
<p>The 652 businesses being presented with NOIs for a Form I-9 audit have been selected for inspection as a result of leads and information obtained through other investigative means. Due to the ongoing, law enforcement sensitive nature of these audits, the names and locations of the businesses will not be released at this time.  If you receive a notice, you should consult with your counsel. However, best practices would require that you: a) respond promptly (or obtain an extension of time to do so), b) do not take any action which could be viewed as tampering with the I-9s or underlying documents, c) initiate an internal review of your practices and an audit, and d) maintain copies of all information and documents provided to DHS.</p>
<p>Note that while you can always take action as to deficient I-9s after you respond to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), you should date such action as of the date taken and not backdate signatures or alter documents.</p>
<p>For guidance or assistance with hiring practices <a title="Human Capital Strategies" href="http://www.hcscando.com/HR.htm" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.hcscando.com/HR.htm?referer=');">click here</a> to speak to professionals.</p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org' onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/yarpp.org?referer=');">Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thepayrollguys.com/2009/07/i-9-audit-notices-to-652-companies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Compliance Issues with State Unclaimed Property Laws Can Have a Devastating Impact on Your Business</title>
		<link>http://thepayrollguys.com/2009/07/compliance-issues-with-state-unclaimed-property-laws-can-have-a-devastating-impact-on-your-business/</link>
		<comments>http://thepayrollguys.com/2009/07/compliance-issues-with-state-unclaimed-property-laws-can-have-a-devastating-impact-on-your-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncashed payroll checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unclaimed Property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepayrollguys.com/?p=62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Snell &#38; Wilmer Legal Alerts: Did you know that compliance issues with unclaimed property laws can create more than just potential exposure with the state taxing authorities? Failure to comply can also create regulatory problems that could dwarf the state liability exposure. Unclaimed property laws are intended to prevent a business from realizing [...]


No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org' onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/yarpp.org?referer=');">Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="justify">From the Snell &amp; Wilmer Legal Alerts:</p>
<p align="justify">Did you know that compliance issues with unclaimed property laws can create more than just potential exposure with the state taxing authorities? Failure to comply can also create regulatory problems that could dwarf the state liability exposure. Unclaimed property<a title="Principal of Human Capital Strategies" href="http://hcscando.com" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/hcscando.com?referer=');"><img class="size-medium wp-image-65 alignleft" title="Jason Knight" src="http://thepayrollguys.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/jason-casual-213x300.jpg" alt="Jason Knight" width="109" height="154" /></a> laws are intended to prevent a business from realizing a windfall if the business holds the property of another party. States have specific rules about how this property must be handled, reported, and transferred to the states. If these rules are not followed completely, the consequences can be significant and, for publicly traded companies, may lead to a Securities &amp; Exchange Commission investigation or other collateral consequences.</p>
<p align="justify"><a title="Unclaimed Property Laws" href="http://www.swlaw.com/files/Publication/fffcd337-94e9-4f3c-ba04-62f65b1e4835/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/71661042-f07d-4c6c-a984-65f6b6cad2a9/Beware!%20%20Compliance%20Issues%20with%20State%20Unclaimed%20Property.pdf" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.swlaw.com/files/Publication/fffcd337-94e9-4f3c-ba04-62f65b1e4835/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/71661042-f07d-4c6c-a984-65f6b6cad2a9/Beware_20_20Compliance_20Issues_20with_20State_20Unclaimed_20Property.pdf?referer=');">Full PDF </a></p>


<p>No related posts.</p>
<p>Related posts brought to you by <a href='http://yarpp.org' onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/yarpp.org?referer=');">Yet Another Related Posts Plugin</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thepayrollguys.com/2009/07/compliance-issues-with-state-unclaimed-property-laws-can-have-a-devastating-impact-on-your-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
